⚠The PNB mailbox has used 133% of what Google lets it send in 24 hours (663 of 500 people written to). Put every file of a case in one mail and copy fewer people — or Google stops it.
Atish Mansing Pawar
LAN 77000349765Loan ₹40,00,000Property loanMails & papers 7 1 draft to send
Correct a detail
Payment seen with your own eyes
A note for the history
Undo a verification
Kind of case — the amount follows it
Who paid the challan
Papers
Out of turn
A step done before the case asked for it. The paper is kept and read, the bank mail written and held for Send; a stop on the case still wants its answer.
Advanced — move the case by hand (ask Abhijit first)
Mail in
10 Sep, 16:01
Documents
Payment
Challan
Filing
E-filing copy
done 14 Sep, 16:08
Index II
waiting 29d 6h
their moveIndex II pending · the trail says: The NOI filing process is well underway, with all necessary documents submitted, fees paid, and the NOI successfully filed on the IGR site. The e-filing copy…whole case so far 33d 6h
Needs your eyes7
In the branch's mail of 10 Sep (from sandip.bodade@icicihfc.com, “LAN NO -77000349765 APPLICANT NAME - MR. SURYAKANT MALKARJUN TODKAR P”), ANOTHER CUSTOMER'S SANCTION LETTER is attached: KFSLetter_77000349765.pdf is SURYAKANT MALKARJUN TODKAR, SANGITA SURYAKANT TODKAR (loan 77000349765)'s, not Atish Mansing Pawar's. Please check with the branch. Nothing should be taken from it — check the loan amount and the property against Atish's own letter.
In the branch's mail of 10 Sep (from sandip.bodade@icicihfc.com, “LAN NO -77000349765 APPLICANT NAME - MR. SURYAKANT MALKARJUN TODKAR P”), a DIFFERENT PERSON'S PAN card is attached: CO APP PAN CARD.pdf is SANGITA SURYAKANT TODKAR (PAN ATZPT7936Q)'s, not Atish Mansing Pawar's. Please check with the branch. It is not used — Atish's own card is not on the file: ask the branch for it.
In the branch's mail of 10 Sep (from sandip.bodade@icicihfc.com, “LAN NO -77000349765 APPLICANT NAME - MR. SURYAKANT MALKARJUN TODKAR P”), a DIFFERENT PERSON'S Aadhaar card is attached: CO APP ADHAR CARD.pdf is Sangita Suryakant Todkar's, not Atish Mansing Pawar's. Please check with the branch. It is not used — Atish's own card is not on the file: ask the branch for it.
In the branch's mail of 10 Sep (from sandip.bodade@icicihfc.com, “LAN NO -77000349765 APPLICANT NAME - MR. SURYAKANT MALKARJUN TODKAR P”), a DIFFERENT PERSON'S Aadhaar card is attached: APP ADHAR CARD.pdf is Suryakant Malkarjun Todkar's, not Atish Mansing Pawar's. Please check with the branch. It is not used — Atish's own card is not on the file: ask the branch for it.
In the branch's mail of 10 Sep (from sandip.bodade@icicihfc.com, “LAN NO -77000349765 APPLICANT NAME - MR. SURYAKANT MALKARJUN TODKAR P”), a DIFFERENT PERSON'S PAN card is attached: APP PAN CARD.pdf is SURYAKANT MALKARJUN TODKAR (PAN AOFPT8504D)'s, not Atish Mansing Pawar's. Please check with the branch. It is not used — Atish's own card is not on the file: ask the branch for it.
The work is done — our fee of ₹29,060.44 is still not in our account. Chase the branch for it.
Selfie / photo: copy on file cannot be used. A usable one is being asked for.
NEXT STEPour move
Send the Index II when it arrives
The e-filing copy is with the branch. This case closes when the government's Index II is shared.
Historywhat happened on this case, newest first
24 Sep1 thing
Checked: this challan is not another case's
15 Sep1 thing — 1 step
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
14 Sep7 things — 7 steps
Challan re-read against the case — matches exactly
The e-filing copy (or the NOI team's words that it went) is on the case — the stage follows it
property self check
property attrs split
A challan on the case could not be placed — whose it is must be read by a person; it does not count until then
property attrs split
property attrs split
13 Sep1 thing — 1 step
property attrs split
11 Sep8 things — 2 documents received · 1 letter written · 5 steps
desk documents backfill
The NOI team's challan / e-filing copy / Index II, mailed to the branch — kept for the bank's window
Received: E-filing copy
eFilingDoc9991109260495.pdf
Received: Sale deed
Todkar hakksod.pdf
The branch pressed 'I have paid' — on the bank's window or the pay link — by bank-link:icici_hfc
bank open document — by bank-link:icici_hfc
bank open document — by bank-link:icici_hfc
bank open document — by bank-link:icici_hfc
10 Sep40 things — 11 documents received · 4 letters written · 3 cautions · 22 steps
desk documents backfill
The NOI team's challan / e-filing copy / Index II, mailed to the branch — kept for the bank's window
The SRO office on the challan is remembered for that district — the next challan there picks it by itself
The made challan does NOT match the case — check before sharing
Check the challan against the case before it is shared.
challan extracted
Received: Challan
SURYAKANT MALKARJUN TODKAR EchallanMH010029886202627E.pdf
Moved to 'challan paid' on the NOI team's own mail
The NOI team's own mail said the challan went — the case followed.
quoted history checked
extra challan scanned
Payment to our account found INSIDE a file (a statement / a receipt in a bundle) — recorded as the branch's payment proof; the bank credit still decides
claim part duplicate
Wrote the documents acknowledged mail — held, silent mode
LAN NO -77000349765 APPLICANT NAME - MR. SURYAKANT MALKARJUN TODKAR PROCESS CHALLAN OF 0.3 & 0.5% AND NOI FIL
acknowledged with advice
An old draft withdrew itself — its asks were already answered
documents read together
screenshot claim recorded
Received: Payment screenshot
PAYMENT SCREEN SHOT (10).jpg
Nothing new to ask for — stayed quiet
Wrote the document chase mail — held, silent mode
LAN NO -77000349765 APPLICANT NAME - MR. SURYAKANT MALKARJUN TODKAR PROCESS CHALLAN OF 0.3 & 0.5% AND NOI FIL
No fee quote sent — the branch's own figures were right
documents read together
The PAN and the Aadhaar name the same person — checked by the engine, no need to compare by hand
Received: PAN card
APP PAN CARD.pdf
Received: Aadhaar
APP ADHAR CARD.pdf
Property read from the legal / technical report (the sanction letter had none)
The PAN and the Aadhaar name the same person — checked by the engine, no need to compare by hand
Property checked by the engine — read from the report, every box that names the flat is there
Co-applicant added
Received: Aadhaar
CO APP ADHAR CARD.pdf
Property read from the legal / technical report (the sanction letter had none)
Received: PAN card
CO APP PAN CARD.pdf
Document could not be read — a clear copy was asked for
this image was captured using a scanning application, not a live selfie
Document could not be read — a clear copy was asked for
this is a scanned photo, not a live selfie
Received: Sanction letter
KFSLetter_77000349765.pdf
Received: Technical report
TECHNICAL REPORT.pdf
Received: LSR
LSR.pdf
Received: Selfie — not usable
APP PHOTO.pdf — this image was captured using a scanning application, not a live selfie
Received: Selfie — not usable
CO APP PHOTO.pdf — this is a scanned photo, not a live selfie
The branch wrote that it has paid (amount / UTR in the mail) — taken as its advice; the bank credit still decides
Case opened from the branch's mail
Older days stay folded — open one to read it. The mails themselves are in the thread above; Abhijit's technical record is under Details & records.
What the e-filing still needs3 still to come
10 of 13 in hand · the challan is done — these are for the filing / KYC
Selfie / photo (CANNOT BE READ — clear copy asked — this image was captured using a scanning application, not a live selfie)open
✓LSR (search report)open
✓Technical reportopen
✓Sanction letteropen
✓PAN cardopen
✓Aadhaar cardopen
✓Paid challan (GRAS)open
✓Sale deedopen
✓E-filing copy (token)open
A challan whose owner could not be read — not counted until a person says — inside Todkar hakksod.pdfopen
✓Property address — verified by the engine, from the legal report (correct below if anything is off)
Applicant's Selfie / Photo — for the e-filing visit later
Mails & papers →every paper, beside its mail · 13 files
The whole file has not been read yet13 papers on file
Moneywaiting for the credit
₹29,060.44
Nothing has reached our account yet — only a credit our bank shows us counts.
Screenshot ₹29,050 — verified by itself the moment the bank credit is heard.
The money may already be here — 4 credit(s) our bank showed us that no case has taken
Check the amount, the minute and the payer before you press — your name goes on it.
The working
Stamp duty 0.3%12,010
Registration fee 0.5%15,000
Government handling350
Our service fee1,700
Total we ask for29,060.44
By law ₹29,050. We ask ₹29,060 (rounded up to ₹10 — our rule).
why?
The NOI team's calculator rounds every percentage row UP to the next ₹10 with a ₹5 buffer, so a challan can never be a rupee short at the SRO counter. The exact figures stay recorded for the cross-check.
Propertyby the engine, from the legal report
Nz Pl No 11/20, Layout Pl No 20, Jijau Park, CTS, 11/20, Khamgaon, 444303
read from the legal report · e-filing boxes 23 of 46 ready
Check the property →the boxes beside the paper
People
SANGITA SURYAKANT TODKAR · co-applicantATZPT7936QSuryakant Malkarjun Todkar · applicantAOFPT8504D
rendered in 1.52 s · 105 queries · this page refreshes by itself when something on it changes (never while you type) · release v516 · build 20ef911f