Hitesh Nitin Poojari and Minjal Hitesh Poojari
LAN 77000360584Loan ₹27,64,559NOIMails & papers 13
Correct a detail
Payment seen with your own eyes
A note for the history
Undo a verification
Kind of case — the amount follows it
Who paid the challan
Papers
Out of turn
A step done before the case asked for it. The paper is kept and read, the bank mail written and held for Send; a stop on the case still wants its answer.
Advanced — move the case by hand (ask Abhijit first)
Mail in
8 Oct, 13:01
Documents
done 8 Oct, 13:02
Payment
took 7m
Challan
done 8 Oct, 13:10 · GRAS ↗
Filing
took 1d 23h · IGR e-filing ↗
E-filing copy
done 10 Oct, 12:45
Index II
took 3d
doneIndex II sharedwhole case so far 7d 6h
For you to check3
Applicant name discrepancy between file and sanction letter — branch's request says Hitesh Nitin Poojari and Minjal Hitesh Poojari; KFSLetter 77000360584.pdf says HITESH NITIN MISTRI, MINJAL HITESH MISTRI.. See the papers →
The work is done — our fee of ₹24,180.11 is still not in our account. Chase the branch for it.
Selfie / photo: copy on file cannot be used. A usable one is being asked for.
NEXT STEPwaiting on the branch
Nothing — this case is done
Index II shared with the branch and the case is closed.
Historywhat happened on this case, newest first
Today · 15 Oct2 things
The challan's address boxes were written from the papers
An old draft withdrew itself — its asks were already answered
Yesterday · 14 Oct2 things — 2 steps
EzDocs checked the e-filing boxes against the papers
EzDocs took 2 steps of its own this day (reading, checking, tidying) — the technical record is under Details & records
13 Oct3 things — 1 document received · 1 letter written · 1 step
Closed from the NOI team's own words — the Index II was already shared with the branch
Nothing more to do on this case.
The NOI team's challan / e-filing copy / Index II, mailed to the branch — kept for the bank's window
Received: Index II
IndexII9991010260050.pdf
10 Oct4 things — 1 document received · 1 letter written · 2 steps
EzDocs took 4 steps of its own this day (reading, checking, tidying) — the technical record is under Details & records
The e-filing copy (or the NOI team's words that it went) is on the case — the stage follows it
The NOI team's challan / e-filing copy / Index II, mailed to the branch — kept for the bank's window
Received: E-filing copy
eFilingDoc9991010260050.pdf
9 Oct12 things — 2 documents received · 2 cautions · 8 steps
EzDocs took 18 steps of its own this day (reading, checking, tidying) — the technical record is under Details & records
The file seems to show a payment to us but no row could be read — open it
The GRN on the filing record came off a challan that is not the NOI's — taken back; no challan is paid on this case
A challan on the case is NOT the NOI's (the sale deed's own, a person as second party) — it does not count
Received: Technical report
Adobe Scan 09 Oct 2026.pdf
Judged again with today's rules, the challan still does not match the case — a person opens it
The file seems to show a payment to us but no row could be read — open it
The SRO office on the challan is remembered for that district — the next challan there picks it by itself
The made challan does NOT match the case — check before sharing
Check the challan against the case before it is shared.
Property checked by EzDocs — read from the report, every box that names the flat is there
Property re-read from this bank's ruling source (ICICI: the technical report)
Received: Technical report
docs-compressed.pdf
8 Oct49 things — 12 documents received · 4 letters written · 2 money steps · 5 cautions · 26 steps
Checked: this challan is not another case's
The NOI team's challan / e-filing copy / Index II, mailed to the branch — kept for the bank's window
The SRO office on the challan is remembered for that district — the next challan there picks it by itself
Challan re-read against the case — matches exactly
Received: Challan
HITESH NITIN MISTRI EchallanMH011617374202627E.pdf
Nikhil pressed Proceed on the challan — what was changed is kept
The branch's title document is on the case — the filing is the NOI team's move
EzDocs took 51 steps of its own this day (reading, checking, tidying) — the technical record is under Details & records
The challan's address boxes were written from the papers
Property checked by EzDocs — read from the report, every box that names the flat is there
Property re-read from this bank's ruling source (ICICI: the technical report)
Received: LSR
DSC CONDITIONAL POSITIVE LOR + SEARCH OF Hitesh mistri - 08.10.2026.pdf
Received: Technical report
HRQ-26-161892_INDProcessRequest_2500320261008131104011.pdf
Judged again with today's rules, the challan still does not match the case — a person opens it
The challan on the case was paid on another loan figure — it counts, and the loan amount is to be settled before the e-filing
The file seems to show a payment to us but no row could be read — open it
The SRO office on the challan is remembered for that district — the next challan there picks it by itself
The challan on file matches neither fee head — a person must open it
The made challan does NOT match the case — check before sharing
Check the challan against the case before it is shared.
Challan paid — the filing waits on the branch's Index II / sale deed (the e-filing starts from its document number)
The paid challan is on the case — moved to filing
The case moves to filing on the IGR site.
Property checked by EzDocs — read from the report, every box that names the flat is there
Property read from the legal / technical report (the sanction letter had none)
Received: Technical report
20260916_175608159_legal.pdf
This file shows no schedule of the property
Wrote the questions for the branch — what the papers leave open mail — held, silent mode
77000360584// Hitesh mistri
Not asked of the bank — what the reading stopped on means the same, or is not the property
EzDocs read the whole file
Wrote the documents acknowledged mail — held, silent mode
77000360584// Hitesh mistri
The bill was worked out from the loan amount (no mail)
Every screenshot and credit SMS is checked against this figure.
The payment proof already on the case was applied
The loan amount was worked out from the papers
The PAN and the Aadhaar name the same person — checked by EzDocs, no need to compare by hand
Payment proof arrived before the case was quoted — held
Received: Payment screenshot
IMG-20260929-WA0015.jpg
A sanction letter naming someone else was not allowed to rename this case
Received: PAN card
20260916_175758203_sign.jpg
Document could not be read — a clear copy was asked for
this is a photograph of a printed photo, not a live selfie
Co-applicant added
The PAN and the Aadhaar name the same person — checked by EzDocs, no need to compare by hand
Received: Selfie — not usable
20260916_175744526_CUSTOMER PHOTO.jpg — this is a photograph of a printed photo, not a live selfie
Co-applicant added
Received: Sanction letter
KFSLetter_77000360584.pdf
Document could not be read — a clear copy was asked for
this is a photograph of a printed photo, not a live selfie
Received: Aadhaar
Minjal AdharCard.pdf
Received: Aadhaar
Hitesh Adhar Card.pdf
Received: Selfie — not usable
20260916_175011019_CUSTOMER PHOTO.jpg — this is a photograph of a printed photo, not a live selfie
Received: PAN card
20260916_175027813_sign.jpg
Case opened from the branch's mail
Older days stay folded — open one to read it. The mails themselves are in the thread above; Abhijit's technical record is under Details & records.
What the e-filing still needs5 still to come
13 of 18 in hand · the challan is done — these are for the filing / KYC
Selfie / photo (CANNOT BE READ — clear copy asked — this is a photograph of a printed photo, not a live selfie)open
A challan that is not the NOI's (the sale deed's own) — not counted — inside Adobe Scan 09 Oct 2026.pdfopen
Applicant's Aadhaar Card — still needed
Applicant's PAN Card — still needed
Applicant's Selfie / Photo — for the e-filing visit later
Mails & papers →every paper, beside its mail · 16 files
The file, as EzDocs remembers it19 open
The file contains the KFS sanction letter, Aadhaar cards, and PAN cards for Hitesh Nitin Mistri and Minjal Hitesh Mistri. However, there is a surname mismatch between the branch's request (Poojari) and the sanction letter/PAN cards (Mistri). More critically, no property documents (technical report,
✗the photo could not be read (20260916_175011019_CUSTOMER PHOTO.jpg) — the branch — this is a photograph of a printed photo, not a live selfie
✗the photo could not be read (20260916_175744526_CUSTOMER PHOTO.jpg) — the branch — this is a photograph of a printed photo, not a live selfie
✗whose file this is: the request names Hitesh Nitin Poojari, our file Hitesh Nitin Poojari and Minjal Hitesh P — a person — The request names 'Hitesh Nitin Poojari and Minjal Hitesh Poojari' while the sanction letter names 'HITESH NITIN MISTRI, MINJAL HITESH MISTR
11 more
✗the papers disagree on Applicant name discrepancy between file and sanction letter (the branch's request: Hitesh Nitin Poojari and Minjal Hitesh Poojari; KFSLetter_77000360584.pdf: HITESH NITIN MISTRI, MINJAL HITESH MISTRI) — a person — Ask the branch to confirm whether the correct legal surname is Mistri or Poojari and provide a clarifying mail or correct document.
✗the papers disagree on Missing property papers (KFSLetter_77000360584.pdf: Does not provide the mortgaged property address or security) — a person — Ask the branch to provide the technical report, legal report, and registered Index II containing the mortgaged property description.
○the photo — the branch
○Hitesh Nitin Poojari and Minjal Hitesh Poojari — PAN — the branch
○Hitesh Nitin Poojari and Minjal Hitesh Poojari — date of birth — the branch
○Hitesh Nitin Poojari and Minjal Hitesh Poojari — mobile — the branch
○Hitesh Nitin Poojari and Minjal Hitesh Poojari — home building — the branch
… and 9 more
?Adobe Scan 09 Oct 2026.pdf may be another customer's (it prints a name) — This paper is a collection of documents for another customer, Akash Rajesh Yadav, and does not belong to this file.
?docs-compressed.pdf may be another customer's (it prints a name) — This paper is a payment receipt from 2019 for IGR, which is not relevant to this file's current challan payment or loan.
?20260916_175608159_legal.pdf may be another customer's (it prints a name) — This paper is not a technical report, legal report, or challan. It is a payment bundle from IDBI Bank and does not belong to this file.
?unsure of Property boxes (Box 1, Box 2, City, PIN) — No technical report, title deed, or property description paper is present on the file.
the branch's last mail (2026-10-09): The branch has sent an attachment. · brought: property documents; property details · settled: disagree:6707a082
read once, kept; every new mail and paper is read against this note · kept 2026-10-09T09:46 UTC
Moneywaiting for the credit
₹24,180.11
Nothing has reached our account yet — only a credit our bank shows us counts.
Screenshot ₹24,800 — verified by itself the moment the bank credit is heard.
The working
Stamp duty 0.3%8,300
Registration fee 0.5%13,830
Government handling350
Our service fee1,700
Total we ask for24,180.11
By law ₹24,166.48. We ask ₹24,180 (rounded up to ₹10 — our rule).
why?
The NOI team's calculator rounds every percentage row UP to the next ₹10 with a ₹5 buffer, so a challan can never be a rupee short at the SRO counter. The exact figures stay recorded for the cross-check.
Propertyby EzDocs, from the Index II
B-510, 5, Orchid (Wing B), SURVEY, 27, Khoni, 421203
read from the Index II · e-filing boxes 45 of 58 ready
Check the property →the boxes beside the paper
People
Hitesh Nitin Poojari and Minjal Hitesh Poojari · applicant—HITESH NITIN MISTRI · applicantBIRPM8533NMinjal Hitesh Mistri · co-applicantAORPV0200N
rendered in 4.52 s · 118 queries · this page refreshes by itself when something on it changes (never while you type) · release v529 · build bfe3c0d1