⚠The PNB mailbox has used 133% of what Google lets it send in 24 hours (663 of 500 people written to). Put every file of a case in one mail and copy fewer people — or Google stops it.
Smita Dattatram Jadhav
LAN HOU/MUM/HL/2023/123456Loan ₹50,50,000NOI SHORT ₹21,780.07Send the e-filing copyMails & papers 1
Correct a detail
Payment seen with your own eyes
A note for the history
Undo a verification
Kind of case — the amount follows it
Who paid the challan
Papers
Out of turn
A step done before the case asked for it. The paper is kept and read, the bank mail written and held for Send; a stop on the case still wants its answer.
Advanced — move the case by hand (ask Abhijit first)
Mail in
7 Oct, 15:24
Documents
Payment
Challan
Filing
done 7 Oct, 15:35 · IGR e-filing ↗
E-filing copy
in the tray 6d 8h
Index II
the government, then the branch
our moveFiled — token due · the trail says: The branch has indicated that the fee has been paid. The team needs to provide a fee quote and the branch needs to provide the loan documents.whole case so far 6d 8h
Needs your eyes6
Wrong customer paper on file — sanction letter says RAMESH KUMAR, Home Loan of Rs. 50,50,000 for FLAT NO. 501, KHARGHAR; Index II of this purchase says DATTARAM VISHNU JADHAV and SMITA DATTAR. See the papers →
Payment SHORT by ₹21,780.07 (₹10,200 of ₹31,980.07).
Challan on file does not agree with the case. Open it before paying or sharing.
The branch sent challans of its own. Decide before the fee mail goes: filing on THEIR challans means our fee only — never the stamp duty and registration fee they have already paid.
The work is done — our fee of ₹31,980.07 is still not in our account. Chase the branch for it.
Payment proof is from 2026-01-24 — an old receipt?
NEXT STEPour move
Send the e-filing copy
Filed; the branch is waiting for the token. Attach the downloaded eFilingDoc… PDF — the token and the DHC's PRN are read off it and the bank mail written.
DHC PRN 0426154913382 · ₹300 · paid 15/04/2026 — read off the filed notice
The challan was paid on another loan figure. The file adds up to ₹8,420 + ₹8,420; it reads: ₹3,160 (stamp-duty head), ₹5,260 (registration head), ₹3,160 (stamp-duty head), ₹5,260 (registration head); this case’s figures say ₹30,160 (0.3% ₹15,160 + 0.5% ₹15,000 on a loan of ₹50,50,000); the challan itself says a loan of ₹10,50,000. The NOI team paid it, so the case is past the challan — but the e-filing must carry the challan’s figure. Settle the loan amount before filing. 1 challan file(s) could not be read — open All documents before paying again.
Historywhat happened on this case, newest first
7 Oct92 things
Challan re-read against the case — matches exactly
Checked: this challan is not another case's
A file was read again from the start — everything inside it now counts
paper read beside case
reading error456
A file was read again from the start — everything inside it now counts
The SRO office on the challan is remembered for that district — the next challan there picks it by itself
The made challan does NOT match the case — check before sharing
Check the challan against the case before it is shared.
challan extracted
reading error456
An old draft withdrew itself — its asks were already answered
extra challan scanned
grn from challan
thread docs swept
Documents the branch had sent were fetched from the mail thread
The branch sent challans of its own — decide the ask before the fee mail: their challans mean our fee only
challan extracted
Received: Challan
Smita dattaram jadhav NOI Challan payment.eml
property self check
property from index2
index2 people checked
property english extracted
The e-filing copy (or the NOI team's words that it went) is on the case — the stage follows it
index2 people checked
Index II (title document) received from the branch
Received: Index II
SMITA DATTARAM JADHAV IndexII9991504260354.pdf
dhc prn read
efiling copy read
Received: E-filing copy
eFilingDoc9991504260354.pdf
A challan on the case is NOT the NOI's (the sale deed's own, a person as second party) — it does not count
challan another borrowers
money settled — by ezdocs:reader
papers not this case
Received: Challan
SMITA DATTARAM JADHAV EchallanMH015916976202526E...pdf
applicant email captured
Property address read from the sanction letter
A sanction letter naming someone else was not allowed to rename this case
roles from letter
Received: Sanction letter
sanction letter.pdf
file note490
branch questions drafted
Wrote the questions for the branch — what the papers leave open mail — held, silent mode
RE: Kindly Process 0.3% & NOI in captioned NHL/THA/1225/1467333 - SMITA DATTATRAM JADHAV
applicant name by reading455 — by ezdocs:reader
case read — by ezdocs:reader
pan by reading443
pan by reading443
Selfie checked — a live one
A real selfie — usable for the e-filing.
Received: Selfie
IMG-20260124-WA0028.jpg
stale claim flagged
screenshot claim recorded
Received: Payment screenshot
IMG-20260124-WA0023.jpg
Selfie checked — a live one
A real selfie — usable for the e-filing.
Received: Selfie
IMG-20260124-WA0022.jpg
The PAN and the Aadhaar name the same person — checked by the engine, no need to compare by hand
card mobile not taken
kyc address read
Received: Aadhaar
1765178852215630.pdf
The PAN and the Aadhaar name the same person — checked by the engine, no need to compare by hand
card mobile not taken
kyc address read
Received: Aadhaar
1765178570488838.pdf
Nothing new to ask for — stayed quiet
No fee quote sent — the branch's own figures were right
Co-applicant added
Received: PAN card
1765178965993002.pdf
roles from letter
Co-applicant added
Received: PAN card
1765178643708060.pdf
property self check
property from index2
index2 people checked
index2 extra purchaser
property english extracted
index2 people checked
index2 extra purchaser
Index II (title document) received from the branch
Received: Index II
index 2.pdf
A challan on the case is NOT the NOI's (the sale deed's own, a person as second party) — it does not count
challan another borrowers
money settled — by ezdocs:reader
Received: Challan
SMITA DATTARAM JADHAV EchallanMH015916976202526E.pdf
The file seems to show a payment to us but no row could be read — open it
case read started — by ezdocs:reader
applicant email captured
Property address read from the sanction letter
Received: Sanction letter
Re: Kindly Process 0.3% & NOI in captioned NHL/THA/1225/1467333 - SMITA DATTATRA
Received: other
image001.png
Received: other
image002.png
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
Nothing new to ask for — stayed quiet
old thread stored only
Case opened from the branch's mail
Older days stay folded — open one to read it. The mails themselves are in the thread above; Abhijit's technical record is under Details & records.
What the e-filing still needs1 still to come
9 of 10 in hand · the challan is done — these are for the filing / KYC
✓Sanction letteropen
✓Paid challan (GRAS)open
✓PAN cardopen
✓Aadhaar cardopen
✓Selfie / photoopen
✓E-filing copy (token)open
A challan that is not the NOI's (the sale deed's own) — not counted — inside SMITA DATTARAM JADHAV EchallanMH01open
✓Property address — verified by the engine, from the Index II (correct below if anything is off)
Mails & papers →every paper, beside its mail · 17 files
The file, as the engine remembers it13 open
The file contains a wrong sanction letter belonging to another customer (Ramesh Kumar, Flat 501 Kharghar, Raigad). The title documents, KYC cards, and request mail are for Dattaram and Smita Jadhav (Flat 702, Aarambh, Thane). The property and borrower sections are filled from the correct Index II, b
○RAMESH KUMAR — date of birth — the branch
○RAMESH KUMAR — home building — the branch
○RAMESH KUMAR — home flat — the branch
○RAMESH KUMAR — home road — the branch
○RAMESH KUMAR — home PIN — the branch
○RAMESH KUMAR — home village / city — the branch
○DATTARAM VISHNU JADHAV — PAN — the branch
○DATTARAM VISHNU JADHAV — mobile — the branch
○DATTARAM VISHNU JADHAV — e-mail — the branch
○SMITA DATTARAM JADHAV — mobile — the branch
… and 3 more
the branch's last mail (2026-10-07): The branch states payment has been made and attaches a screenshot.
read once, kept; every new mail and paper is read against this note · kept 2026-10-07T09:56 UTC
Moneywaiting for the credit
₹31,980.07
Nothing has reached our account yet — only a credit our bank shows us counts.
Screenshot ₹10,200. Case needs ₹31,980.07. SHORT by ₹21,780.07. Ask the branch for the balance.
why?
A screenshot is the branch's claim, not money seen — and this claim is short of what the case needs. It is ₹21,750 below the real calculation of ₹31,950 (government + DHC + our fee) — so it is short whatever the buffer. The NOI team's 'short amount' letter asks for the balance with the table.
The money may already be here — 1 credit(s) our bank showed us that no case has taken
Check the amount, the minute and the payer before you press — your name goes on it.
The working
Stamp duty 0.3%15,160
Registration fee 0.5%15,000
Government handling320
Our service fee1,500
Total we ask for31,980.07
By law ₹31,970. We ask ₹31,980 (rounded up to ₹10 — our rule).
why?
The NOI team's calculator rounds every percentage row UP to the next ₹10 with a ₹5 buffer, so a challan can never be a rupee short at the SRO counter. The exact figures stay recorded for the cross-check.
Propertyby the engine, from the Index II
702, 7, AARAMBH, KOMOYO BLDG, BLDG C, WING C-1, SURVEY, 21, Vadavali, 410210
read from the Index II · e-filing boxes 43 of 58 ready
Check the property →the boxes beside the paper
People
RAMESH KUMAR · applicantADCPJ7506KSMITA DATTARAM JADHAV · applicantABRPJ3374QDATTARAM VISHNU JADHAV · co-applicant…6822
rendered in 1.26 s · 110 queries · this page refreshes by itself when something on it changes (never while you type) · release v516 · build 20ef911f