⚠The PNB mailbox has used 133% of what Google lets it send in 24 hours (663 of 500 people written to). Put every file of a case in one mail and copy fewer people — or Google stops it.
AMIR Khan
LAN 022653647Loan ₹10,00,000NOIMails & papers 7 2 drafts to send
Correct a detail
Payment seen with your own eyes
A note for the history
Kind of case — the amount follows it
Who paid the challan
Papers
Out of turn
A step done before the case asked for it. The paper is kept and read, the bank mail written and held for Send; a stop on the case still wants its answer.
Advanced — move the case by hand (ask Abhijit first)
Mail in
9 Oct, 17:14
Documents
took 1h 25m
Payment
waiting 4d 6h · DARBAR 1m
Challan
Filing
on the IGR site · IGR e-filing ↗
E-filing copy
the token to the branch
Index II
the government, then the branch
waiting on the branchAcknowledged · the trail says: The branch has provided the loan documents and confirmed payment. The team needs to generate and share the challan.whole case so far 4d 8h
Needs your eyes2
Loan Amount discrepancy between Application form and Sanction Letter — Application form.pdf says ₹10,00,000; Soft SanctionLetter_1402078.pdf says ₹8,57,934.. See the papers →
Challan on file does not agree with the case. Open it before paying or sharing.
NEXT STEPour move
Waiting on us
Outstanding: the payment to reach our account. The engine has asked — nothing to do here unless you want to phone the branch.
The challan was paid on another loan figure. The file adds up to ₹24,580; it reads: ₹9,580 (stamp-duty head), ₹15,000 (registration head); this case’s figures say ₹8,020 (0.3% ₹3,010 + 0.5% ₹5,010 on a loan of ₹10,00,000); the challan itself says a loan of ₹31,90,000. No sanction letter on this file prints ₹31,88,335–₹31,91,668, alone or with another — is it this customer’s challan? Open it before pressing either button. The NOI team paid it, so the case is past the challan — but the e-filing must carry the challan’s figure. Settle the loan amount before filing.
Historywhat happened on this case, newest first
9 Oct87 things
grn from challan
The NOI team's challan / e-filing copy / Index II, mailed to the branch — kept for the bank's window
The SRO office on the challan is remembered for that district — the next challan there picks it by itself
The made challan does NOT match the case — check before sharing
Check the challan against the case before it is shared.
A challan on the case is NOT the NOI's (the sale deed's own, a person as second party) — it does not count
challan another borrowers
challan extracted
Received: Challan
SHAMSHAD ABDULHAI KHAN EchallanMH011729170202627E.pdf
A file was read again from the start — everything inside it now counts
reading error456
copilot edit — by copilot:DARBAR
copilot check ok — by copilot
form checked489
whole file hold — by copilot
money check hold — by copilot
cards read
The PAN and the Aadhaar name the same person — checked by the engine, no need to compare by hand
The home address was read off the papers — by ezdocs:reader
file note490
file note490
mail against file490 — by ezdocs:reader
documents read together
Received: other
image008.jpg
Received: other
image002.jpg
Received: other
image009.jpg
mail against file490 — by ezdocs:reader
documents read together
A paper was read well — it is used, never asked for again
file note490
branch questions drafted
Wrote the questions for the branch — what the papers leave open mail — held, silent mode
RE: Noi Confirmation in case of AMIR Khan-1402078.
branch from reading501 — by ezdocs:reader
case read — by ezdocs:reader
The PAN and the Aadhaar name the same person — checked by the engine, no need to compare by hand
A paper was read well — it is used, never asked for again
document read again
property self check
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
boxes gathered
address compared
challan boxes composed
box disagreement
Received: other
Shamshad Property pepr - Gauripada.pdf
pages trimmed480
Wrote the documents acknowledged mail — held, silent mode
NOI case NOI-2026-03363
acknowledged with advice
roles from letter
An old draft withdrew itself — its asks were already answered
Co-applicant added
No fee quote sent — the branch's own figures were right
The payment proof already on the case was applied
Received: other
image003.jpg
money settled — by ezdocs:reader
money not settled
papers not this case
Received: other
image001.jpg
box disagreement
Received: other
image004.jpg
money settled — by ezdocs:reader
Received: other
image005.png
Property address read from the sanction letter
case read started — by ezdocs:reader
applicant email captured
Property address read from the sanction letter
roles from letter
sanction handwritten
Received: other
image006.gif
Co-applicant added
Received: Sanction letter
Soft SanctionLetter_1402078.pdf
Received: PAN card
PAN Card- Shamshad.pdf
Received: Sanction letter
Application form.pdf
Received: Aadhaar
Adhar Card- Shamshad.pdf
quoted history checked
extra challan scanned
Nothing new to ask for — stayed quiet
Payment to our account found INSIDE a file (a statement / a receipt in a bundle) — recorded as the branch's payment proof; the bank credit still decides
Payment proof arrived before the case was quoted — held
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
case read started — by ezdocs:reader
Wrote the document chase mail — held, silent mode
FW: Noi Confirmation in case of AMIR Khan-1402078.
boxes gathered
party from case name
documents read together
Payment proof arrived before the case was quoted — held
Received: Payment screenshot
IMG-20261009-WA0067.jpg
Received: other
image002.jpg
Case opened from the branch's mail
Older days stay folded — open one to read it. The mails themselves are in the thread above; Abhijit's technical record is under Details & records.
Papers4 still to come
5 of 9 in hand · for the challan and the filing
✓Aadhaar cardopen
✓Sanction letteropen
✓PAN cardopen
✓Paid challan (GRAS)open
A challan that is not the NOI's (the sale deed's own) — not counted — inside SHAMSHAD ABDULHAI KHAN EchallanMH0open
Property address — READ from the sanction letter, nothing missing. A person must confirm it: check the boxes and mark VERIFIED.
Applicant's Selfie / Photo — for the e-filing visit later
Index II copy / Title document — for the e-filing visit later
✓ PAN and Aadhaar name the same person — checked by the engine: SAYRABANO SHAMSHAD KHAN
Mails & papers →every paper, beside its mail · 16 files
The file, as the engine remembers it8 open
File reviewed for Amir Khan with loan reference. Sanction letter dated 08-OCT-2026 for Rs 857934 is used for property details. Missing MOTD and Index II.
○the photo — the branch
○the Index II — the branch
○SAYRABANO SHAMSHAD KHAN — PAN — the branch
○SAYRABANO SHAMSHAD KHAN — e-mail — the branch
○property — number kind (survey / CTS / plot …) — the branch
○property — area — the branch
○this desk's fee (Rs 9540) — the branch
✗the papers disagree on Loan Amount discrepancy between Application form and Sanctio (Application form.pdf: 1000000; Soft SanctionLetter_1402078.pd: 857934) — a person — Confirm the final sanctioned loan amount with the branch before proceeding with challan payment.
?unsure of date_of_mortgage — No Memorandum of Deposit of Title Deeds (MOTD) is present on the file.
the branch's last mail (2026-10-09): The branch asks for the challan to be generated and shared, and notes that the NOI should be in the name of the property owner.
read once, kept; every new mail and paper is read against this note · kept 2026-10-09T13:06 UTC
Moneywaiting for the credit
₹9,540.46
Nothing has reached our account yet — only a credit our bank shows us counts.
Screenshot ₹25,980 — verified by itself the moment the bank credit is heard.
Paid by GPay at 2026-10-09 — verified when Google's NEFT lands in the PNB account (within hours).
Two loans of this borrower on one mortgage: ₹10,00,000 (the loan, LAN 022653647) + ₹8,57,934 (HOME LOAN, LAN 1402078) = ₹18,57,934 — the branch's mail names it; the case holds ₹10,00,000. This file holds 2 sanction letters of this lender in the borrower's own name, each for a facility of its own on this property (the branch's mail names it). One lender, one borrower, one property: the notice of intimation secures the whole borrowing on this mortgage, so the fee is computed on the total, not on one letter. The branch's mail naming one loan account is the case's label, not a list of what is secured. Open the letters and the branch's mail. Unless the mail says one of these loans is filed separately (a second token), set the loan amount on the case page to ₹18,57,934 and press Fill again; the fee the branch pays is the witness — its ask on the total settles it.
An earlier sanction letter (Application form.pdf) carried a handwritten change on the amount: '10,00,000'. The later letter dated 08-OCT-2026 supersedes it — read the later one once. A handwritten change on a printed letter is not the bank's sanction; a revised letter is. Check that the later letter prints the figure the branch wrote by hand on the earlier one.
The money may already be here — 1 credit(s) our bank showed us that no case has taken
Check the amount, the minute and the payer before you press — your name goes on it.
The working
Stamp duty 0.3%3,010
Registration fee 0.5%5,010
Government handling320
Our service fee1,200
Total we ask for9,540.46
By law ₹9,520. We ask ₹9,540 (rounded up to ₹10 — our rule).
why?
The NOI team's calculator rounds every percentage row UP to the next ₹10 with a ₹5 buffer, so a challan can never be a rupee short at the SRO counter. The exact figures stay recorded for the cross-check.
Propertynot verified yet
802, 8th Floor, Awling SAI Regency, 802, Kalyan West, 421301
read from the sanction letter · e-filing boxes 53 of 58 ready
Check the property →the boxes beside the paper
People
SHAMSHAD ABDULHAI KHAN · co-applicantAPQPK5302LAMIR Khan · applicantEMCPK6301JSAYRABANO SHAMSHAD KHAN · co-applicantFAYPK0107F
rendered in 6.36 s · 131 queries · this page refreshes by itself when something on it changes (never while you type) · release v516 · build 20ef911f