← back to NOI-2026-02494
KRISHNA KUMAR MISHRA — everything the e-filing asks for
NOI-2026-02494 · ICICI Home Finance Company Ltd · read by EzDocs from the technical report — not yet verified by a person
Step 2 of 2: the e-filing. The challan is paid; its boxes are folded below.
64 of 70 e-filing boxes ready
Empty: Date of Mortgage, Mobile (person 2), Mobile (person 3), Floor (person 3), Mobile (person 4), Floor (person 4)
25 box(es) highlighted — no Index II on the case yet, so the property boxes come from another paper; not from the Index II / the Aadhaar, worked out, or EzDocs was not sure: District, Taluka, Village, Hadd type (Corporation / Council / Gram Panchayat), Hadd name, Road, Number type (SURVEY / GAT / CTS / PLOT / KHASRA …), Number …
Challan: 13 of 13 boxes on the case · highlighted: District, Property box 1 (flat, floor, building, survey / gat / CTS), Property box 2 (the road), City / village · paid
amber = not from the Index II (property) / the Aadhaar (home), worked out, or EzDocs was not sure — look at these; red = another paper prints something different, or EzDocs disagrees — decide; plain = from the authority for that box, in the document.
EzDocs is reading this file’s papers against every box on the form. Nothing is held up — refresh in a few seconds to see what it found.
THIS CHALLAN WAS PAID WITH THIS STILL OPEN
One paper writes the boxes. Every other paper on this case was read against them — this is where they disagree.
EzDocs is still reading the papers behind these. Nothing is held up — refresh in a few seconds and it will say what it found.
EzDocs is still reading the papers behind these. Nothing is held up — refresh in a few seconds and it will say what it found.
STOP · CITY
A PIN belongs to one district only. Our own papers put 400099 in MUMBAI on 2 other cases. So either the PIN or the district is wrong.
What to do: Open the paper the address came from. Read the PIN and the district off the same line. The PIN decides. Fix it on the case page. Then check the office too — the office must be in the property's own district, or the challan cannot be used for the filing.
STOP · BOX 1
A technical report says what a flat is worth. The sale deed and the legal report say WHICH flat is being bought and mortgaged. A different number is not a spelling difference.
What to do: Open Krishna Kumar Mishra-Thane-Koteshwar CHSL (1).pdf and read the flat number in the property description. If it says 202, ask the branch to confirm in writing. Then fix the flat number on the case page and press Fill again. A notice filed on the wrong flat protects nothing.
Before every challan, check these six
- the flat / unit number — against the SALE DEED and the LEGAL report, not the valuation alone
- every land number the paper prints is in box 1 — a missing number is a different property
- the district — does the PIN agree with it? a taluka name decides nothing
- the SRO office is in the property's own district
- the payer is the borrower, with the middle name the papers print
- the loan amount is the figure this bank's letter calls final
Property — the challan’s address and the e-filing’s Property page
Read from the technical report — when the Index II lands it takes these boxes over by itselfThe same flat on the other papers? Only the Index II’s address goes on the challan and the e-filing; the others are compared with it, never typed.
⚠ the legal report (Krishna Kumar Mishra-Thane-Koteshwar CHS): looks like the same place — check — “Flat No.202, on the 2nd floor, Adm. 400 sq. ft. (Carpet area), in the building known as ‘’Koteshwar Building", society known as ‘’Koteshwar ” (some names agree (4 of 9); not on one side: vartak, kharkar, nkt; the flat agrees)
no Index II on the case yet — when the branch sends it, these boxes are re-read from it by themselves
each runs in seconds; the page comes back with the result at the top
Start page
Date of Mortgage
—
—
empty — the portal will not take a blank
from: read off the MOTD when it lands; typed on the portal otherwise
Mortgagor page — party 1 (KRISHNA KUMAR MISHRA)
The home on the other papers — the Aadhaar’s stands on the Mortgagor page; a correspondence address on the letter need not match. One paper prints a different address — look once.
✗ the sanction letter (KFSLetter_77000357353 (2).pdf): a DIFFERENT address — decide — “FLAT NO 205 BUILDING NO 2 Runwal plaza Pokhran road 1, Thane west Vartak Nagar Jekegram, Jekegram, Thane, THANE, MAHARASHTRA, IN, 400606” (flat 502 vs 205)
The portal asks for the person’s home address — read off the Aadhaar.
Mortgagor page — party 2 (SAROJ K MISHRA)
The portal asks for the person’s home address — read off the Aadhaar.
Mortgagor page — party 3 (NARENDRA T CHOUNAL)
The portal asks for the person’s home address — read off the Aadhaar.
Mortgagor page — party 4 (CHAMPA TARADUTT CHOUNAL)
The portal asks for the person’s home address — read off the Aadhaar.
Mortgagee page (the bank)
Loan (Rs.) *
4500000
4500000
✓ in the document
from: the sanction letter's total incl. insurance — the same figure as the challan's consideration
Interest Rate (%) *
8.1
8.1
✓ in the document
from: the sanction letter
Only the two boxes above are typed on this page. The bank’s own boxes (MICR, TAN, the authorised person, the office address) are prefilled and locked by the portal from the bank’s login profile (seen on the ICICI and PNB logins); the co-pilot never types them — it reads them back, EzDocs checks them against the case, and an empty locked box (the profile’s PAN, say) is said in amber: that is fixed under the portal’s Account, not here. Saved on this bank: MICR 400402031, TAN MUMI03639G — the co-pilot checks the open login against these; the signer RASHMI SINGH (read off the portal at the first filing, or typed once on Calculator → E-filing details).
Payment page
GRN
MH010881998202627E
MH010881998202627E
✓ in the document
Paid amount
28510.00
28510.00
✓ in the document
Challan date
25/09/2026
25/09/2026
✓ in the document
DHC PRN
—
—
empty (optional)
Last gathered 25 Sep 19:13: filled 9 box(es) from Krishna Kumar Mishra-Thane-Koteshwar CHSL (1).pdf, HRQ-26-159169_INDProcessRequest_2500320260925175333053.pdf, KFSLetter_77000357353 (2).pdf, Cooapplicant aadha; still empty: home post office (person 1), email (person 2), mobile (person 2), home post office (person 2), attr2 type, attr2 value, dob (person 1), pan (person 1) · 12 box(es) confirmed by a second paper
⚠ found email = “kkhmishra@gmail.com” in the sanction letter but could not tell WHOSE it is (no name printed beside it and the case has more than one person) — type it on the right person.
⚠ found mobile = “9870427152” in the sanction letter but could not tell WHOSE it is (no name printed beside it and the case has more than one person) — type it on the right person.
⚠ found mobile = “9870427152” in the technical report but could not tell WHOSE it is (the printed name 'mr.milind kale' matches nobody) — type it on the right person.
⚠ found building = “Runwal Plaza” in the sanction letter but could not tell WHOSE it is (no name printed beside it and the case has more than one person) — type it on the right person.
The challan — paid; what it carried
Challan (GRAS) — what the form asks
13 of 13 boxes on the case; 4 highlightedOpen the challan page — the GRAS form exactly as it will be typed, every box correctable beside the paper. The co-pilot types these on GRAS; the property boxes below feed box 1 / box 2 / city. The challan is paid — GRN MH010881998202627E.
District *
Thane
⚠ from the technical report (HRQ-26-159169_INDProcessRequest_25003202) — not the Index II — check
from: the technical report (HRQ-26-159169_INDProcessRequest_25003202)
SRO office
THN2_THANE 2 JOINT SUB REGISTRAR
✓ on the case
from: this case's own challan, else the office we used last in the district — any office of the district is valid
Article *
6(1) Deposit of Title Deed
✓ on the case
from: always, for an NOI
Stamp duty (0.3%) *
13500.00
✓ on the case
from: the fee engine, on the loan amount incl. insurance
Registration fee (0.5%, max 15,000) *
15000.00
✓ on the case
from: the fee engine
Payer (first party) *
KRISHNA KUMAR MISHRA
✓ on the case
from: the PAN card, else the sanction letter's applicant, else the case's applicant name
Payer PAN *
AIRPM6107B
✓ on the case
from: the PAN card
Payer mobile (the receipt SMS goes here) *
9870427152
✓ on the case
from: the sanction letter (KFSLetter_77000357353 (2).pdf)
Second party (the bank) *
ICICI Home Finance Company Ltd
✓ on the case
from: the case's bank
Second party PAN *
AAACI6285N
✓ on the case
from: typed once on Calculator → E-filing details, or read off a paid challan
Property box 1 (flat, floor, building, survey / gat / CTS) *
FLAT NO 204 SECOND FLOOR WING G GAYATRI DHAM PHASE II CHSL OLD SURVEY NO 184 NEW SURVEY NO 152
⚠ from the technical report (HRQ-26-159169_INDProcessRequest_25003202) — not the Index II — check; the papers print more numbers than the port
from: the Index II (4) — as typed on GRAS
Property box 2 (the road) *
HISSA NO 3 VILLAGE MIRA TALUKA AND DISTRICT THANE MIRA ROAD EAST
⚠ from the technical report (HRQ-26-159169_INDProcessRequest_25003202) — not the Index II — check
from: the Index II (4) — as typed on GRAS
City / village *
THANE
⚠ from the technical report (HRQ-26-159169_INDProcessRequest_25003202) — not the Index II — check
from: the technical report (HRQ-26-159169_INDProcessRequest_25003202)
PIN
400099
✓ on the case
from: the technical report (HRQ-26-159169_INDProcessRequest_25003202)
Consideration (the loan amount) *
4500000
✓ on the case
from: the sanction letter's total incl. insurance
Paper:
100%open full size ↗
Flat No.202,2nd Floor, Koteshwar Building, Survey No.190,Cts No.189b, Kharkar Road, Thane West-400099.
rendered in 1.35 s · 43 queries · this page refreshes by itself when something on it changes (never while you type) · release v530 · build 0f000022