Ashok Ambadas lingayat
LAN HOU/ARNG/0426/5076413Loan ₹10,35,000NOIMails & papers 8
Correct a detail
Payment seen with your own eyes
A note for the history
Kind of case — the amount follows it
Who paid the challan
Papers
Out of turn
A step done before the case asked for it. The paper is kept and read, the bank mail written and held for Send; a stop on the case still wants its answer.
Advanced — move the case by hand (ask Abhijit first)
Mail in
22 Sep, 16:56
Documents
took 12m
Payment
Challan
done 5 Oct, 10:15 · GRAS ↗
Filing
took 2d 4h · IGR e-filing ↗
E-filing copy
done 7 Oct, 14:35
Index II
took 22h
doneIndex II shared · the history says: The branch has sent the loan documents and the Index II. The team needs to provide the fee quote to the branch.whole case so far 23d
For you to check4
Property: plot number difference — sanction letter says Plot No. 38; Index II says PLOT NO 39.. See the papers →
In the branch's mail of 5 Oct (from asmita.kulkarni@pnbhousing.com, “RE: FW: NOI & CHALLAN FOR -HOU/ARNG/0426/5076413-LINGAYAT ASHOK AMBADA”), ANOTHER CUSTOMER'S SANCTION LETTER is attached: Fw: HOU/ARNG/0426/5076413 - LINGAYAT ASHOK AMBADAS.eml is RAMESH KUMAR (loan HOU/MUM/HL/2023/123456)'s, not Ashok Ambadas lingayat's. Please check with the branch. Nothing should be taken from it — check the loan amount and the property against Ashok's own letter. (Set aside as another customer's.)
The work is done — our fee of ₹10,110.22 is still not in our account. Chase the branch for it.
1 more
Payment proof is from 2026-05-25 — an old receipt?
NEXT STEPwaiting on the branch
Nothing — this case is done
Index II shared with the branch and the case is closed.
Historywhat happened on this case, newest first
Today · 15 Oct1 thing
An old draft withdrew itself — its asks were already answered
8 Oct1 thing — 1 step
Closed from the NOI team's own words — the Index II was already shared with the branch
Nothing more to do on this case.
7 Oct1 thing — 1 step
The e-filing copy (or the NOI team's words that it went) is on the case — the stage follows it
5 Oct27 things — 6 documents received · 3 letters written · 3 money steps · 15 steps
Payment to our account found INSIDE a file (a statement / a receipt in a bundle) — recorded as the branch's payment proof; the bank credit still decides
EzDocs took 45 steps of its own this day (reading, checking, tidying) — the technical record is under Details & records
An old draft withdrew itself — its asks were already answered
Wrote the questions for the branch — what the papers leave open mail — held, silent mode
RE: FW: NOI & CHALLAN FOR -HOU/ARNG/0426/5076413-LINGAYAT ASHOK AMBADAS
EzDocs read the whole file
Challan paid — the filing waits on the branch's Index II / sale deed (the e-filing starts from its document number)
The paid challan is on the case — moved to filing
The case moves to filing on the IGR site.
Documents the branch had sent were fetched from the mail thread
Received: other
image002.jpg
The loan amount was worked out from the papers
Received: Index II
ASHOK AMBADAS LINGAYAT Index-II.pdf
Received: Sanction letter — not usable
Fw: HOU/ARNG/0426/5076413 - LINGAYAT ASHOK AMBADAS.eml — it prints RAMESH KUMAR; this case's people are Ashok Ambadas lingayat, LINGAYAT ASHOK AMBADAS — another customer's sanction letter (the branch sends several customers' papers in one mail). Kindly share this case's own sanction letter
Challan re-read against the case — matches exactly
Received: Challan
LINGAYAT ASHOK AMBADAS EchallanMH003320560202627E.pdf
Received: other
image001.jpg
Payment to our account found INSIDE a file (a statement / a receipt in a bundle) — recorded as the branch's payment proof; the bank credit still decides
The branch's payment screenshot was read
The loan amount was worked out from the papers
Wrote the documents acknowledged mail — held, silent mode
NOI case NOI-2026-03125
No fee quote sent — the branch's own figures were right
The PAN and the Aadhaar name the same person — checked by EzDocs, no need to compare by hand
The loan amount was worked out from the papers
Property address read from the sanction letter
Received: Sanction letter
DocScanner 27 May 2026 1-21 pm.pdf
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
Nothing new to ask for — stayed quiet
Case opened from the branch's mail
Older days stay folded — open one to read it. The mails themselves are in the thread above; Abhijit's technical record is under Details & records.
What the e-filing still needs1 still to come
8 of 9 in hand · the challan is done — these are for the filing / KYC
Property address — READ from the sanction letter, nothing missing. A person must confirm it: check the boxes and mark VERIFIED.
Mails & papers →every paper, beside its mail · 6 files
The file, as EzDocs remembers it10 open
This case has a major stop conflict regarding the property's plot number (Plot No. 38 in the sanction letter and MOTD schedule, but Plot No. 39 in the registered Index-II). Clarification is required from the branch.
✗the sanction letter on file is another customer's (Fw: HOU/ARNG/0426/5076413 - LINGAYAT ASHOK AMBADAS.eml) — the branch — it prints RAMESH KUMAR; this case's people are Ashok Ambadas lingayat, LINGAYAT ASHOK AMBADAS — another customer's sanction letter (the bran
✗the papers disagree on Property: plot number difference (the sanction letter: Plot No. 38; Index-II: PLOT NO 39) — a person — Ask the branch to clarify whether the mortgaged plot is 38 or 39 and send a corrected sanction letter or amendment before proceeding.
○property — taluka — the branch
7 more
○property — flat / unit — the branch
○property — floor — the branch
○property — road / locality — the branch
○property — area — the branch
○property — area unit — the branch
○property — title deed held — the branch
○we's fee (Rs 10110) — the branch
the branch's last mail (2026-10-05): The branch has sent a mail with attachments for loan HOU/ARNG/0426/5076413 for applicant LINGAYAT ASHOK AMBADAS.
read once, kept; every new mail and paper is read against this note · kept 2026-10-05T04:41 UTC
Moneywaiting for the credit
₹10,110.22
Nothing has reached our account yet — only a credit our bank shows us counts.
Screenshot ₹10,090 — ₹20 under our ask, not below the real calculation ₹10,080. Counts as full. Nothing to ask.
why?
The branch paid the statutory-exact figure (our ₹10 round-ups are the buffer). Rule (boss, 4 Sep): everything above the real calculation — government + DHC ₹300 + our fee — up to our rounded-up ask is the NOI team's own buffer (the ₹10 round-ups, the ₹20 DHC margin), never a short payment; anything below the real calculation is short. The screenshot is still a claim: money counts only on the credit SMS or a person's Verify.
This payment is from the Vyapar QR (HDFC) at 2026-05-25 — EzDocs cannot hear this road. Please verify manually. Verify manually ↓
The money may already be here — 2 credit(s) our bank showed us that no case has taken
Check the amount, the minute and the payer before you press — your name goes on it.
The working
Stamp duty 0.3%3,110
Registration fee 0.5%5,180
Government handling320
Our service fee1,500
Total we ask for10,110.22
By law ₹10,100. We ask ₹10,110 (rounded up to ₹10 — our rule).
why?
The NOI team's calculator rounds every percentage row UP to the next ₹10 with a ₹5 buffer, so a challan can never be a rupee short at the SRO counter. The exact figures stay recorded for the cross-check.
Propertynot verified yet
PLOT NO 39, G, Swapnangan Park Phase 1, PLOT, 38, Mauje Pisadevi, 431001
read from the sanction letter · e-filing boxes 29 of 34 ready
Check the property →the boxes beside the paper
People
LINGAYAT ASHOK AMBADAS · applicantACIPL8066D
rendered in 1.06 s · 125 queries · this page refreshes by itself when something on it changes (never while you type) · release v529 · build bfe3c0d1