Mansi Vijay Pawar
LAN 77000360669Loan ₹20,25,000NOIMails & papers 9
Correct a detail
Payment seen with your own eyes
A note for the history
Undo a verification
Kind of case — the amount follows it
Who paid the challan
Papers
Out of turn
A step done before the case asked for it. The paper is kept and read, the bank mail written and held for Send; a stop on the case still wants its answer.
Advanced — move the case by hand (ask Abhijit first)
doneIndex II shared · the history says: The NOI has been filed and its Index II has been shared with the branch. The case is closed.whole case so far 21d 5h
Master dataNOI INDEX 2 SHARED · 26 Sep 2026Open the row
For you to check5
Another customer's papers on file — second technical report says Narendra Kumar Tripathi, loan 77000364317; this case says Mansi Vijay Pawar, loan 77000360669.. See the papers →
In the branch's mail of 30 Sep (from surendra.pal@icicihfc.com, “NOI of ------77000360669----Mansi Vijay Pawar”), a DIFFERENT PERSON'S PAN card is attached: Narendra KYC _compressed.pdf is NARENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI (PAN ADOPT9448E)'s, not Mansi Vijay Pawar's. Please check with the branch. It is not used — Mansi's own PAN card is typed. (Set aside as another customer's.)
In the branch's mail of 30 Sep (from surendra.pal@icicihfc.com, “NOI of ------77000360669----Mansi Vijay Pawar”), ANOTHER CUSTOMER'S SANCTION LETTER is attached: KFSLetter_77000364317 (1).pdf is NARENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI, RINKU DEVI (loan 77000364317)'s, not Mansi Vijay Pawar's. Please check with the branch. Nothing should be taken from it — check the loan amount and the property against Mansi's own letter. (Set aside as another customer's.)
2 more
The branch sent challans of its own. Decide before the fee mail goes: filing on THEIR challans means our fee only — never the stamp duty and registration fee they have already paid.
GPay ₹18,270 announced at 06:51 has not settled into the PNB account (due 10:51). Paste PNB statement (SMS page) or Check Settlements in GPay Business.
NEXT STEPwaiting on the branch
Nothing — this case is done
Index II shared with the branch and the case is closed.
Historywhat happened on this case, newest first
15 Oct1 thing
An old draft withdrew itself — its asks were already answered
10 Oct1 thing — 1 step
EzDocs took 2 steps of its own this day (reading, checking, tidying) — the technical record is under Details & records
7 Oct2 things — 2 steps
A bundle wrongly marked unreadable (for a photo / a card inside it) counts again — everything inside it
EzDocs took 2 steps of its own this day (reading, checking, tidying) — the technical record is under Details & records
1 Oct1 thing — 1 step
An old draft withdrew itself — its asks were already answered
30 Sep18 things — 5 documents received · 2 letters written · 1 money step · 10 steps
Closed from the NOI team's own words — the Index II was already shared with the branch
Nothing more to do on this case.
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
The NOI team's challan / e-filing copy / Index II, mailed to the branch — kept for the bank's window
Received: Index II
IndexII9992609260485.pdf
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
EzDocs read the whole file
The challan's address boxes were written from the papers
EzDocs took 18 steps of its own this day (reading, checking, tidying) — the technical record is under Details & records
PAN found inside the KYC file — no need to ask for it
The loan amount was worked out from the papers
The branch's payment screenshot was read
This file shows no schedule of the property
Received: Payment screenshot
327481.jpg
Received: Sanction letter — not usable
KFSLetter_77000364317 (1).pdf — it prints NARENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI, RINKU DEVI; this case's people are MANSI VIJAY PAWAR, Mansi Vijay Pawar — another customer's sanction letter (the branch sends several customers' papers in one mail). Kindly share this case's own sanction letter
Received: PAN card — not usable
Narendra KYC _compressed.pdf — it prints NARENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI; this file's people are Mansi Vijay Pawar, MANSI VIJAY PAWAR, NANDA VIJAY PAWAR (the branch's request and this customer's own sanction letter) — a card of another customer (the branch's thread carried another customer's papers). Kindly share this case's own Aadhaar card
Received: Technical report
IND_APF_REPORT_10342792VAL1 (1).pdf
Wrote the Index II chase mail — held, silent mode
Index II pending — NOI NOI-2026-02519 | 77000360669
26 Sep37 things — 8 documents received · 4 letters written · 3 money steps · 22 steps
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
EzDocs took 41 steps of its own this day (reading, checking, tidying) — the technical record is under Details & records
The e-filing copy (or the NOI team's words that it went) is on the case — the stage follows it
The NOI team's challan / e-filing copy / Index II, mailed to the branch — kept for the bank's window
Received: E-filing copy
eFilingDoc9992609260485.pdf
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
The challan's address boxes were written from the papers
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
The NOI team's challan / e-filing copy / Index II, mailed to the branch — kept for the bank's window
The SRO office on the challan is remembered for that district — the next challan there picks it by itself
Challan re-read against the case — matches exactly
Received: Challan
MANSI VIJAY PAWAR EchallanMH010903647202627E.pdf
NIKHIL pressed Proceed on the challan — what was changed is kept
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
The challan's address boxes were written from the papers
Challan paid — the filing waits on the branch's Index II / sale deed (the e-filing starts from its document number)
The paid challan is on the case — moved to filing
The case moves to filing on the IGR site.
The bill was worked out from the loan amount (no mail)
Every screenshot and credit SMS is checked against this figure.
A waiting bank credit was matched to this case
A credit that had been waiting found its case.
Payment verified against the credit in our account
The challan can be made now — money is no longer the wait.
Wrote the questions for the branch — what the papers leave open mail — held, silent mode
NOI of ------77000360669----Mansi Vijay Pawar
EzDocs read the whole file
The PAN and the Aadhaar name the same person — checked by EzDocs, no need to compare by hand
PAN found inside the KYC file — no need to ask for it
The loan amount was worked out from the papers
The loan amount was worked out from the papers
Property checked by EzDocs — read from the report, every box that names the flat is there
Property address read from the sanction letter
Property read from the legal / technical report (the sanction letter had none)
Received: other
image.png
Received: PAN card
Scan document2026-09-26 12-57-29.pdf
Received: Sanction letter
KFSLetter_77000360669.pdf
Received: Technical report
IND_APF_REPORT_10339458VAL1.pdf
Received: Sanction letter
Mansi verified POL.pdf
The branch sent challans of its own — decide the ask before the fee mail: their challans mean our fee only
Received: Challan
Mansi Payment Challan.jpg
Case opened from the branch's mail
Older days stay folded — open one to read it. The mails themselves are in the thread above; Abhijit's technical record is under Details & records.
What the e-filing still needsall in
10 of 10 in hand · the challan is done — these are for the filing / KYC
Mails & papers →every paper, beside its mail · 13 files
Moneyall of it is in
₹18,260.51
Paid and tied ✓ ₹18,270 from Mansi P reached the account Sat 26 Sep, 12:21 — equals our ask; no screenshot or UTR agrees yet. The challan is paid.
Reached our account 26 Sep 12:21:00.
How we know
Our own bank told us — 26 Sep 12:21
₹18,270 · from GPAY-BIZ
“₹18,270 received from Mansi P at 12:21 pm”
Matched by: AMOUNT ALONE — equals our ask; no screenshot or UTR agrees yet · the payer is the applicant himself — his own fee
✗ Looks like another payment — check it
| Bank message | Screenshot | Case | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transaction number | — | …079367 | – | |
| Amount | ₹18,270 | ₹26,070 | fee ₹18,260.51 | ✗ |
| Time | Sat 26 Sep, 12:21 | — | – | |
| Paid by | Mansi P | N K TRIPATHI | Mansi Vijay Pawar | ✓ |
the screenshot: ₹26,070 · Wed 30 Sep, 15:18 · UTR 130470079367 · from N K TRIPATHI · to EZDOCS · 3535@okbizaxis
The working
Stamp duty 0.3%6,080
Registration fee 0.5%10,130
Government handling350
Our service fee1,700
Total we ask for18,260.51
By law ₹18,250. We ask ₹18,260 (rounded up to ₹10 — our rule).
why?
The NOI team's calculator rounds every percentage row UP to the next ₹10 with a ₹5 buffer, so a challan can never be a rupee short at the SRO counter. The exact figures stay recorded for the cross-check.
Propertyby EzDocs, from the technical report
2108, 21st Floor, Building No 11 Mhada Complex, 2108, Virar West, 401303
read from the technical report · e-filing boxes 32 of 34 ready
Check the property →the boxes beside the paper
People
MANSI VIJAY PAWAR · applicantFVQPP6500Q
rendered in 2.39 s · 123 queries · this page refreshes by itself when something on it changes (never while you type) · release v535 · build a7b52f39