Ganesh Arjun Dimble
LAN HOU/WRJE/0826/5209025Loan ₹23,43,250NOIMails & papers 8
Correct a detail
Payment seen with your own eyes
A note for the history
Undo a verification
Kind of case — the amount follows it
Who paid the challan
Papers
Out of turn
A step done before the case asked for it. The paper is kept and read, the bank mail written and held for Send; a stop on the case still wants its answer.
Advanced — move the case by hand (ask Abhijit first)
Mail in
30 Sep, 21:39
Documents
Payment
Challan
done 30 Sep, 22:14 · GRAS ↗
Filing
took 6d 15h · IGR e-filing ↗
E-filing copy
done 7 Oct, 14:00
Index II
took 7d 3h
doneIndex II shared · the history says: The branch has sent all required documents and confirmed payment for the NOI process. The NOI team has generated and shared the challan, and is now ready to…whole case so far 14d 20h
For you to check2
The work is done — our fee of ₹20,590.57 is still not in our account. Chase the branch for it.
2 difference(s) between the papers to look at once — none stops the challan. See them →
NEXT STEPwaiting on the branch
Nothing — this case is done
Index II shared with the branch and the case is closed.
Historywhat happened on this case, newest first
Today · 15 Oct1 thing
An old draft withdrew itself — its asks were already answered
Yesterday · 14 Oct3 things — 1 document received · 1 letter written · 1 step
Closed from the NOI team's own words — the Index II was already shared with the branch
Nothing more to do on this case.
The NOI team's challan / e-filing copy / Index II, mailed to the branch — kept for the bank's window
Received: Index II
IndexII9990310260730.pdf
7 Oct4 things — 1 document received · 1 letter written · 2 steps
EzDocs took 2 steps of its own this day (reading, checking, tidying) — the technical record is under Details & records
The e-filing copy (or the NOI team's words that it went) is on the case — the stage follows it
The NOI team's challan / e-filing copy / Index II, mailed to the branch — kept for the bank's window
Received: E-filing copy
eFilingDoc9990310260730.pdf
2 Oct1 thing — 1 step
EzDocs took 5 steps of its own this day (reading, checking, tidying) — the technical record is under Details & records
1 Oct1 thing — 1 step
EzDocs read the whole file
30 Sep42 things — 10 documents received · 3 letters written · 1 money step · 1 caution · 27 steps
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
The paid challan is on the case — moved to filing
The case moves to filing on the IGR site.
The NOI team's challan / e-filing copy / Index II, mailed to the branch — kept for the bank's window
The SRO office on the challan is remembered for that district — the next challan there picks it by itself
Challan re-read against the case — matches exactly
Received: Challan
GANESH ARJUN DIMBLE EchallanMH011195761202627E.pdf
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
A file was read again from the start — everything inside it now counts
A paper was read again — the team's value showed the first reading was wrong
SANDEEP pressed Proceed on the challan — what was changed is kept
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
EzDocs found something to check before the form is saved
EzDocs read the whole trail as one conversation — where the case stands is on the page
EzDocs read the whole file
The challan's address boxes were written from the papers
The challan's address boxes were written from the papers
Co-applicant added
EzDocs took 44 steps of its own this day (reading, checking, tidying) — the technical record is under Details & records
The loan amount was worked out from the papers
The PAN and the Aadhaar name the same person — checked by EzDocs, no need to compare by hand
Wrote the documents acknowledged mail — held, silent mode
NOI case NOI-2026-03066
No fee quote sent — the branch's own figures were right
Payment proof arrived before the case was quoted — held
This payment is counted on another case too — a person must say whose it is
Co-applicant added
Received: Payment screenshot
IMG-20260930-WA0002.jpg
Index II (title document) received from the branch
Received: Aadhaar
CO-APP ADHAR CARD.jpg
Received: Aadhaar
App Adhar Card.pdf
Property address read from the sanction letter
Received: PAN card
CO-APP PAN CARD.jpg
Selfie checked — a live one
A real selfie — usable for the e-filing.
Selfie checked — a live one
A real selfie — usable for the e-filing.
Received: Selfie
IMG20260930163643.jpg
Received: PAN card
Pan card.pdf
Received: Selfie
IMG20260930163658.jpg
Received: Index II
INDEX 2 Dimble.pdf
Received: Sanction letter
Sanction_letter (97).pdf
Payment proof arrived before the case was quoted — held
The branch wrote that it has paid (amount / UTR in the mail) — taken as its advice; the bank credit still decides
Case opened from the branch's mail
Older days stay folded — open one to read it. The mails themselves are in the thread above; Abhijit's technical record is under Details & records.
What the e-filing still needsall in
10 of 10 in hand · the challan is done — these are for the filing / KYC
Mails & papers →every paper, beside its mail · 12 files
The file, as EzDocs remembers it7 open
Processed the Notice of Intimation details for Mr. Ganesh Arjun Dimble. Highlighted spelling variations on the co-applicant's name (Sangeeta vs Sangita, Dimble vs Dimbale) and a minor spelling error ('FALT') on the sanction letter. The loan amount includes the insurance premium as per bank rules. Th
○SANGEETA ARJUN DIMBLE — mobile — the branch
○SANGEETA ARJUN DIMBLE — e-mail — the branch
○SANGEETA ARJUN DIMBLE — home building — the branch
6 more
○Sangita Arjun Dimbale — date of birth — the branch
○Sangita Arjun Dimbale — mobile — the branch
○Sangita Arjun Dimbale — e-mail — the branch
○we's fee (Rs 20590) — the branch
?the papers disagree on Co-applicant's name spelling (the sanction letter: SANGITA ARJUN DIMBLE; the co-applicant's PAN card: SANGEETA ARJUN DIMBLE; the co-applicant's Aadhaar car: Sangita Arjun Dimbale; the Index II: Sangita Arjun Dimble) — Verify the correct spelling of the co-applicant's name; the PAN card spelling (SANGEETA ARJUN DIMBLE) is used on the form.
?unsure of Date of mortgage — The Memorandum of Deposit of Title Deeds (MOTD) is not on the file, so the actual date of mortgage cannot be verified.
the branch's last mail (2026-10-09): The branch is asking for the NOI index II.
read once, kept; every new mail and paper is read against this note · kept 2026-10-09T07:35 UTC
Moneywaiting for the credit
₹20,590.57
Nothing has reached our account yet — only a credit our bank shows us counts.
The working
Stamp duty 0.3%7,040
Registration fee 0.5%11,730
Government handling320
Our service fee1,500
Total we ask for20,590.57
By law ₹20,566. We ask ₹20,590 (rounded up to ₹10 — our rule).
why?
The NOI team's calculator rounds every percentage row UP to the next ₹10 with a ₹5 buffer, so a challan can never be a rupee short at the SRO counter. The exact figures stay recorded for the cross-check.
Propertyby EzDocs, from the Index II
502, 5th, Shri Lakshmi Vrundavan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., SURVEY, 74, Dhayari, 411041
read from the Index II · e-filing boxes 53 of 58 ready
Check the property →the boxes beside the paper
People
GANESH ARJUN DIMBLE · applicantFZVPD5917ESangita Arjun Dimbale · applicantBAMPD0704RSANGEETA ARJUN DIMBLE · applicantBAMPD0704R
rendered in 0.89 s · 113 queries · this page refreshes by itself when something on it changes (never while you type) · release v529 · build bfe3c0d1