Sagar Prakash Pachpol
LAN 10346896Loan ₹20,00,000NOIMails & papers 2 1 new 2 drafts to send
Correct a detail
Payment seen with your own eyes
A note for the history
Undo a verification
Kind of case — the amount follows it
Who paid the challan
Papers
Out of turn
A step done before the case asked for it. The paper is kept and read, the bank mail written and held for Send; a stop on the case still wants its answer.
Advanced — move the case by hand (ask Abhijit first)
Mail in
today 14:07
Documents
waiting 1h 17m
Payment
Challan
Filing
on the IGR site · IGR e-filing ↗
E-filing copy
the token to the branch
Index II
the government, then the branch
waiting on the branchNeeds documentswhole case so far 1h 18m
For you to check2
Loan account number mismatch between file record and sanction letter — case file record says ₹1,03,46,896; Sanction letter says ₹77,00,03,68,657.. See the papers →
The fee is verified but this case still reads as waiting for payment. Catching up now — this page refreshes itself.
NEXT STEPwaiting on the branch
Waiting on the branch
Outstanding: Payment Screenshot with UTR. EzDocs has asked — nothing to do here unless you want to phone the branch.
Historywhat happened on this case, newest first
Today · 16 Oct29 things
Nothing new to ask for — stayed quiet
Wrote the document chase mail — held, silent mode
Re: Request to provide NOI CALCULATION case of Mr. Sagar Prakash Pachpol -10346896 (77000368657, 77000368658)
An old draft withdrew itself — its asks were already answered
Payment verified against the credit in our account
The challan can be made now — money is no longer the wait.
Wrote the document chase mail — held, silent mode
Re: Request to provide NOI CALCULATION case of Mr. Sagar Prakash Pachpol -10346896 (77000368657, 77000368658)
An old draft withdrew itself — its asks were already answered
EzDocs took 25 steps of its own this day (reading, checking, tidying) — the technical record is under Details & records
An old draft withdrew itself — its asks were already answered
The PAN and the Aadhaar name the same person — checked by EzDocs, no need to compare by hand
Wrote the questions for the branch — what the papers leave open mail — held, silent mode
Re: Request to provide NOI CALCULATION case of Mr. Sagar Prakash Pachpol -10346896 (77000368657, 77000368658)
EzDocs read the whole file
Wrote the document chase mail — held, silent mode
Re: Request to provide NOI CALCULATION case of Mr. Sagar Prakash Pachpol -10346896 (77000368657, 77000368658)
Wrote the fee quote mail — held, silent mode
Re: Request to provide NOI CALCULATION case of Mr. Sagar Prakash Pachpol -10346896 (77000368657, 77000368658)
The challan's address boxes were written from the papers
Property checked by EzDocs — read from the report, every box that names the flat is there
Property read from the legal / technical report (the sanction letter had none)
The PAN and the Aadhaar name the same person — checked by EzDocs, no need to compare by hand
Received: Technical report
HRQ-26-173258_INDProcessRequest_2500320261016114259042.pdf
The loan amount was worked out from the papers
Co-applicant added
Received: logo
image.png
Selfie checked — a live one
A real selfie — usable for the e-filing.
Selfie checked — a live one
A real selfie — usable for the e-filing.
Received: Sanction letter
KFSLetter_77000368657.pdf
Received: Aadhaar
Sagar pachpol KYC.pdf
Received: Selfie
1003091501.jpg
Received: Selfie
1003054825.jpg
Received: other
Sagar Pachpol Draft.pdf
Case opened from the branch's mail
Older days stay folded — open one to read it. The mails themselves are in the thread above; Abhijit's technical record is under Details & records.
Papers2 still to come
7 of 9 in hand · for the challan and the filing
Payment Screenshot with UTR — still needed
Index II copy / Title document — for the e-filing visit later
✓ PAN and Aadhaar name the same person — checked by EzDocs: SAGAR PRAKASH PACHPOL
Mails & papers →every paper, beside its mail · 7 files
The file, as EzDocs remembers it11 open
File contains the technical report, sanction letter, PAN and Aadhaar cards for Sagar Prakash Pachpol and co-applicant Madhavi Yuvraj Savale. There is a loan account number discrepancy between the internal file record and the sanction letter which requires branch confirmation. The property details ar
✗the papers disagree on Loan account number mismatch between file record and sanctio (case file record: 10346896; Sanction letter: 77000368657) — a person — Confirm with the branch whether loan account number 10346896 or 77000368657 is the correct active LAN for this notice of intimation.
○the Aadhaar — the branch
○the PAN card — the branch
7 more
○the payment screenshot — the branch
○the Index II — the branch
○Sagar Prakash Pachpol — date of birth — the branch
○Sagar Prakash Pachpol — home flat — the branch
○Madhavi Yuvraj Savale — e-mail — the branch
○Madhavi Yuvraj Savale — home building — the branch
○Madhavi Yuvraj Savale — home flat — the branch
… and 1 more
the branch's last mail (2026-10-16): The branch is requesting the NOI calculation for a loan case.
read once, kept; every new mail and paper is read against this note · kept 2026-10-16T08:39 UTC
Moneyall of it is in
₹18,070.75
Tied on the amount alone. ₹18,140 from MEGHANATH today 14:35 — no screenshot or transaction number agrees yet. If it is this case's, say Yes on the money desk.
Reached our account 14:35:01.
How we know
Our own bank told us — 14:35
₹18,140 · UTR 628963465211 · from CP-HDFCBN-S
“Successful! You have received Rs. 18140.00 via HDFC Bank SmartHub Vyapar from MEGHANATH. RRN-628963465211, Check: https://1.hdfc.bank.in/HDFCBK/s/j9VaME6x”
Matched by: AMOUNT ALONE — a little over our ask
? Matched on the amount only — check it
| Bank message | Screenshot | Case | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transaction number | …465211 | — | – | |
| Amount | ₹18,140 | — | fee ₹18,070.75 | ✓ |
| Time | today 14:35 | — | – | |
| Paid by | MEGHANATH | — | Sagar Prakash Pachpol | – |
Probably ₹20,00,000 — the branch's own numbers point at it: its mail names ₹20,00,000. Confirm with one press on the case page (or pick the other if the branch worked on the wrong figure). Two loans of this borrower on one mortgage: ₹20,00,000 (Home Loan and Purchase/Improvement of Property, LAN 10346896) + ₹20,00,000 (Home Loan and Purchase/Improvement of Property, LAN 77000368657) = ₹40,00,000 — the branch's mail names it; the case holds ₹20,00,000. This file holds 2 sanction letters of this lender in the borrower's own name, each for a facility of its own on this property (the branch's mail names it). One lender, one borrower, one property: the notice of intimation secures the whole borrowing on this mortgage, so the fee is computed on the total, not on one letter. The branch's mail naming one loan account is the case's label, not a list of what is secured. Open the letters and the branch's mail. Unless the mail says one of these loans is filed separately (a second token), set the loan amount on the case page to ₹40,00,000 and press Fill again; the fee the branch pays is the witness — its ask on the total settles it.
The working
Stamp duty 0.3%6,010
Registration fee 0.5%10,010
Government handling350
Our service fee1,700
Total we ask for18,070.75
By law ₹18,050. We ask ₹18,070 (rounded up to ₹10 — our rule).
why?
The NOI team's calculator rounds every percentage row UP to the next ₹10 with a ₹5 buffer, so a challan can never be a rupee short at the SRO counter. The exact figures stay recorded for the cross-check.
Propertyby EzDocs, from the technical report
Flat No.E-11, Second Floor, Building E, Tirupati Park, GAT, 161, Tisgaon, 431001
read from the technical report · challan boxes 13 of 13 ready
Check the property →the boxes beside the paper
People
Sagar Prakash Pachpol · applicantDMEPP2855KMadhavi Yuvraj Savale · co-applicantVJDPS4639J
rendered in 2.03 s · 141 queries · this page refreshes by itself when something on it changes (never while you type) · release v532 · build 18d6b07b